CPECN

Blog: Avoiding manual data entry errors

Mike Edwards   

Features Beamex

An example where the calibration data has been entered manually on a paper form. Possibly some numbers have been entered incorrectly, it is difficult to read some of them, manual error calculation is difficult, is that tick a pass or a fail, who signed that, and so on.

Many businesses still use a lot of manual entry in their industrial processes. This is despite the fact that it is commonly known and accepted that it is a slow and labor-intensive process and there are always human errors related to manual data entry — human errors are natural.

It is commonly accepted that the typical error rate in manual data entry is about 1%.

What does this 1% mean in practice in calibration processes, and how can you make it smaller, or even get rid of it?

To start with, let’s take a look at the common ways in which data is handled in industrial calibration processes:

1. Pen & paper
2. Manual entry into a calibration system
3. Electronic storing of data

It is obvious that there are errors in manual data entry. It seems to be a commonly accepted rule that in manual data entry, human errors will cause a 1% average error rate.

This blog post by Beamex mainly focuses on industrial calibration processes and the manual data entry related to these processes. Continue reading here.


Print this page

Advertisement

Stories continue below